摘要

PPP模式在我国的发展较发达国家滞后,理论研究与实践研究均有一定的局限性,例如政府与社会私营企业出资

比例与风险分担不合理,未能真正缓解政府财政压力,运营期间双方未能按期回收成本等;另外,当前我国缺乏合理的P

PP项目绩效评价体系,在一定程度上制约了PPP项目的发展,例如PPP项目实际实施情况、政府与社会私营企业收益

情况以及政府制定的城市发展目标均未能得到合理体现,无法使得PPP项目目标得到有效评估;同时也使得PPP项目

运作过程存在一定风险,例如加重政府负担、引发政府与社会私营企业纠纷,因此,如何科学合理的开展PPP项目绩效

评价是当前亟需解决的问题。

本文通过综合分析了国内外最新研究成果,分别进行了如下研究:首先,基于文献研究与问卷调查研究从项目投

入、项目过程、项目结果与项目影响等评价维度分别分析了影响PPP项目绩效的各类因素,进而建立了PPP项目绩

效评价指标体系,具体包括4项评价维度与21项二级评价指标;其次,通过对比分析常用的指标权重确定方法,确定选用

熵权法计算PPP项目绩效评价指标权重,此基础之上应用模糊综合评价法建立PPP项目绩效综合评价模型;再者,以A

高速公路项目作为案例研究对象,采用专家打分法与熵权法结合计算评价指标权重,进而依据模糊综合评价模型与最

大隶属度原则,确定该项目绩效水平,验证了该绩效评价模型的科学性与适用性;最后,从评价维度详细分析了案例项

目绩效评价结果,并从拓宽融资渠道、加强PPP项目信息平台建设等方面提出了具体的提高PPP项目绩效的建议与

措施。

本文研究成果有效的丰富了PPP模式基础理论,为PPP项目绩效评价提供了科学的理论与实践研究方法,对今后

提升PPP项目绩效管理具有一定的指导意义。

关键词:PPP模式;绩效评价;熵权法;模糊综合评价

Study on PPP Project Performance Evaluation: A Case Study of A Highway Project

Specialty:Business Administration Name: Instructor:Prof. ABSTRACT

The development of PPP model in China lags behind that in developed countries. There are some limitation

s in theoretical research and practical research, such as unreasonable proportion of investment and risk sharing

between the government and private enterprises, failure to really alleviate the financial pressure of government, f

ailure of both sides to recover costs on time during operation, etc.In addition, the current lack of a reasonable PP

P project performance evaluation system in China, to a certain extent, restricts the development of PPP projects,

such as the actual implementation of PPP projects, the income of government and social private enterprises, and

the urban development goals formulated by the government have not been rationally reflected, and can not make

the PPP project objectives effectively evaluated.At the same time, there are some risks in the process of PPP pr

oject operation, such as increasing the burden of government and causing disputes between the government an

d private enterprises. Therefore, how to carry out PPP project performance evaluation scientifically and reasonab

ly is an urgent problem to be solved.

In this paper, the latest research results at home and abroad are comprehensively analyzed, and the followin

g studies are carried out respectively.Firstly, based on literature research and questionnaire research, the factors

affecting PPP project performance are analyzed from the evaluation dimensions of project input, project process,

project results and project impact, and then the PPP project performance evaluation index system is established,

which includes four evaluation dimensions and 21 secondary evaluation indexes.Secondly, through the comparat

ive analysis of the commonly used methods to determine the weight of indicators, the entropy weight method is s

elected to calculate the weight of PPP project performance evaluation indicators. On this basis,a comprehensive

evaluation model of PPP project performance is established by using the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation metho

d.Furthermore, taking A highway project as a case study object, this paper calculates the weight of evaluation ind

ex by using expert scoring method and entropy weight method, and then determines the performance level of the

project based on the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model and principle of maximum membership degree, whic

h verifies the scientificity and applicability of the performance evaluation model.Finally, the results of performance

evaluation of case projects are analyzed in detail from the evaluation dimension, and specific suggestions and m

easures to improve the performance of PPP projects are put forward from the aspects of broadening financing ch

annels and strengthening the construction of information platform of PPP projects.

The research results of this paper effectively enrich the basic theory of PPP model, provide scientific theoreti

cal and practical research methods for PPP project performance evaluation, and which have certain guiding signi

ficance for improving PPP project performance management in the future.

Keywords:PPP mode; Performance appraisal; Entropy weight method; Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation